Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT)

Providing slow continuous renal replacement therapy to achieve specific clinical goals for AKI management
Kidneys

The continuum of kidney dysfunction

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a heterogeneous syndrome1,2 associated with poor patient outcomes with each patient having a unique risk profile and trajectory of disease progression.3,4 The term AKI describes a spectrum of acute kidney dysfunction, as part of the continuum of kidney dysfunction from AKI to Acute Kidney Diseases and Disorders (AKD) to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).1,5  Persistent severe AKI can be defined as Stage 3 AKI lasting for ≥ 72 hours and may progress to AKD or CKD.5,6 

CRRT is the preferred modality among many clinicians to achieve specific clinical goals for AKI management, providing flexibility to meet the evolving needs of each patient. 

AKI associated with poor patient outcomes

Arrow displaying Incidences

Reported incidences vary

The reported incidence of AKI among ICU patients varies from 0.5% to

78.7%7 - 9; up to ~25% of these patients may require RRT.12 - 15

Cross for mortality

Risk of mortality

AKI is associated with an increased risk of morbidity16 - 26 and short- and long-term mortality.27 - 30

Damaged kidneys

Progression to CKD

AKI is associated with an increased risk of progression to CKD, including ESRD.28,31

Patient factors For modality Selection

A cornerstone treatment for patients with severe AKI32

Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) represents a major component of AKI management, particularly in severe cases, with different modalities to address the patient’s evolving clinical needs during the course of disease.   

Selection of RRT modality is highly influenced based on the patient’s hemodynamic status and severity of fluid overload. Clinical guidelines recommend using CRRT and Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy (IRRT) as complementary therapies for patients with severe AKI1, therefore clinicians must decide which modality is appropriate for a particular patient at any one time.

“We suggest using CRRT, rather than standard intermittent RRT, for hemodynamically unstable patients. (Grade 2B)”1

-KDIGO Kidney Disease. Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney

CRRT is the preferred RRT modality for patients with AKI who are hemodynamically unstable or require precise fluid management. 

Graph showing Fluid accumulation Over time

CRRT for precise fluid management

•    CRRT has been shown to reduce fluid accumulation in an effective and timely manner,32,34 providing the flexibility to adjust fluid removal intensity at any time according to changes in the patient’s clinical condition1.

•    Limited evidence suggests that CRRT may be able to provide better control of fluid management than other RRT modalities1,33,34.

Figure adapted from Bouchard J, et al. Kidney Int. 2009;76(4):422-427. Details of data collection and statistical analysis were not reported.

Graph comparing IHD with CVVHD

CRRT for patients with AKI who are hemodynamically unstable

•    Hemodynamic instability is common among critically ill patients with AKI receiving RRT (~36–70% of patients),35,36 and may be associated with an increased risk of mortality and AKI progression.37,38

•    Existing medical evidence suggests that CRRT may be better able to maintain hemodynamic stability while removing fluid compared with IHD and SLED.34,39,40

Randomized controlled trial of 80 critically ill adult patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis in the ICUs at an institution in the US (1995–1999). Data are for IHD and CVVHD therapy during the initial dialysis day. Shown are median values with interquartile range (box borders) and extreme values (whiskers).

Graph showing CRRT as a cost-Effective therapy

CRRT can be a cost-effective therapy that may provide additional clinical and operational benefits for patients and hospitals

  • Initial treatment of patients with ​AKI using CRRT may be more ​cost-effective at 5 years post RRT initiation than other RRT modalities.41 A cost-effectiveness analysis found that CRRT may save an estimated US$1,668 over 5 years.​41,b,c 
  • Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest CRRT to be cost-effective compared with intermittent RRT, with dialysis dependence rate as the major driver of cost-effectiveness.42
Microphone Podcast icon

Podcast Series: Conversations in Nephrology

KDIGO is a global organization based in Belgium working toward evidence based clinical practice guidelines in kidney disease. Baxter recently collaborated with KDIGO to sponsor three podcasts related to CRRT

Listen now
Conversations In nephrology Podcast image

Episode 1: Deciding When and Who Should Start Acute Dialysis: From Evidence to Bedside Practice

Hosted by: Ravi Mehta, UC San Diego, featuring Marlies Ostermann, Guy’s & St. Thomas’ Foundation Trust

Listen now
Conversations In nephrology Podcast image

Episode 2: Maximizing Filter Life During CRRT: Best Practices on Anticoagulation and Citrate Use

Hosted by: Ravi Mehta, UC San Diego, featuring Ashita Tolwani, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Listen now
Conversations In nephrology Podcast image

Episode 3. How to Develop a CRRT Quality Program: Quality Metrics and Continuous Improvement

Hosted by: Ravi Mehta, UC San Diego, featuring Theresa Mottes, Baylor College of Medicine 

Listen now

Related Products